How MyETF Aims to Unlock Spain’s ETF Market
In Spain, conventional investment funds allow investors to switch between them without triggering capital gains tax. ETFs—despite lower fees and real-time trading—do not enjoy the same privilege; selling an ETF for a gain immediately generates a tax bill. This fiscal friction largely explains why more than €500 billion is parked in traditional funds while ETF assets in Spain remain a fraction of European peers.
The newly launched platform MyETF claims to have found a way around that barrier. Built by fintech firm Flinket, it wraps ETF investments inside a unit‑linked life insurance policy—a structure regulated by Spain’s Directorate General of Insurance. Under this umbrella, buying and selling ETFs inside the policy is treated as a switch within the insurance wrapper, not a direct disposal for tax purposes. Taxation only occurs when the investor withdraws money from the platform, effectively deferring the tax hit.
The project is fronted by Gabriella Orille, former CEO of neobank MyInvestor, and backed by serial investor Joan Mir (an early backer of Glovo and Wallapop). MyETF offers more than 100 ETFs via a mobile app inspired by platforms like Revolut and Trade Republic. The platform charges a 1% annual management fee on assets, requires a minimum investment of €3,000 (€1,000 for the first 100 clients), and relies on the balance-sheet strength of Catalan insurer MGC as the policy issuer. Legal opinions from Baker & McKenzie, Cuatrecasas and Gómez Acebo underpin the regulatory compliance of the structure.
The Insurance Wrapper Strategy and Its Implications
Why Spain’s ETF Market Has Been Held Back
Spain’s tax code treats ETFs like shares: each profitable sale crystallises a capital gain that must be declared. While investors in countries such as Germany routinely use ETFs for long‑term savings and tactical trading, Spanish savers have overwhelmingly stuck with traditional funds that allow tax‑free internal rebalancing. This asymmetry has starved the domestic ETF market, even as European inflows hit €113.6 billion in the second quarter—80% more than a year earlier, according to Amundi data.
How the Unit‑Linked Wrapper Works—And Its Trade‑offs
A unit‑linked policy is a life‑insurance contract where the investment risk falls on the policyholder. By placing ETFs inside that legal frame, MyETF turns every purchase or sale into an intra‑policy event, not a taxable disposal. The structure is well established across Europe and is explicitly regulated in Spain. However, the tax benefit is one of deferral, not elimination: all accumulated gains will be taxed when the investor partially or fully exits the platform. Meanwhile, the 1% annual fee—levied on total assets—may offset a significant portion of the cost advantage that ETFs hold over traditional funds, particularly for long‑term buy‑and‑hold investors.
Who Gains and Who Loses from MyETF’s Launch
Active traders and frequent rebalancers stand to gain the most, as repeated sales would otherwise generate a series of taxable events. For passive savers who rarely change their portfolio, the arithmetic is less clear-cut; buying ETFs directly through a broker and paying the eventual tax may still leave them better off after taking the annual 1% into account. Established banks and fund managers, which benefit from the stickiness of traditional fund wrappers, face a new source of competition. If MyETF succeeds in attracting even a small slice of the €500 billion sitting in Spanish funds, it could reshape distribution dynamics.
Potential Regulatory and Reputation Risks
Unit‑linked products have occasionally attracted regulatory scrutiny or reputational damage when used to sell complex, high‑fee products. MyETF’s offering is deliberately simple—a transparent menu of listed ETFs—but any structure that significantly alters tax treatment carries an inherent risk of future legal or regulatory challenge. The involvement of a licensed insurer and multiple legal opinions provides a robust compliance foundation, yet the tax authority’s interpretation of aggressive use of the unit‑linked wrapper could evolve over time.
What MyETF Means for Spanish Investors
Spanish retail investors considering the platform should weigh the following:
- Cost versus benefit: The 1% annual fee reduces the net return of the ETF portfolio. Compare this to the tax you might pay if you simply bought and held ETFs directly. For a buy‑and‑hold strategy of many years, the insurance wrapper might not be the cheapest route.
- Deferral, not forgiveness: You still owe tax on all gains, but only when you take money out of MyETF. This is most valuable if you expect to trade frequently or rebalance often throughout the year.
- Access thresholds: The standard minimum investment is €3,000, but early adopters can start with €1,000. This may exclude very small savers.
- Product scope: The platform currently offers more than 100 ETFs. Check that the ETFs you want—whether indexing the Nasdaq, gold, or an active strategy—are in that selection before committing.
- Insurer backing: Because the structure relies on a unit‑linked policy issued by MGC, your holdings are subject to insurance guarantee schemes and regulation, which adds a layer of protection beyond the ETF assets themselves.
- Compare with alternatives: Neobanks and brokers like Revolut or Trade Republic already allow ETF trading, but without the tax wrapper. For frequent trading, the MyETF approach may be superior, but for very long‑term holdings, direct ownership could still win after fees.
Risk & Opportunity Assessment
| Commercial Risk | Medium | MyETF is a startup with no track record; its 1% annual fee on assets may deter cost-sensitive investors and slow asset gathering needed to reach scale. |
| Competitive Risk | High | Large Spanish banks and fund platforms could replicate the unit-linked ETF wrapper or improve their own offerings, while neobanks like Revolut already have a large user base and could add a similar insurance structure quickly. |
| Regulatory Risk | Medium | Although the unit-linked wrapper is legal and backed by credible legal opinions, aggressive use of insurance shells to neutralise a tax disadvantage could attract scrutiny from tax authorities or lead to rule changes. |
| Reputation Risk | Low | The product is transparent—a simple wrapper for listed ETFs—and is issued by a licensed insurer. Past controversies around unit-linked policies have typically involved complex, high-fee structures, which MyETF avoids. |
| Technology Disruption | Low | No breakthrough technology is involved; the innovation is purely legal and structural, repurposing a well-known insurance vehicle for a new asset class. |
| Commercial Opportunity | High | The platform targets Spain’s €500 billion fund market, where a large pool of investors might switch if the tax barrier is removed. Rising global appetite for ETFs and Spain’s current under-penetration create a substantial addressable market. |
Comments 0