Why Two Former NBA Players Are Targeting the 2027 WNBA Draft
Royce White and Enes Kanter Freedom, two former NBA players, say they intend to enter the 2027 WNBA draft. White, whose NBA career consisted of three games in a single season more than a decade ago, and Freedom, a former center who became a U.S. citizen in 2021 and added Freedom to his legal name, argue they would meet the league's current eligibility standards.
The move is framed as a challenge to the WNBA's approach to inclusion and self-identification. Freedom said he had studied the league's eligibility rules and that he was not trying to mock, disrespect or amuse himself at the expense of any community. Instead, he said, the aim is to push the league to define more precisely who is allowed to play.
The announcement lands in an ongoing debate. Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham said last month that she would not support transgender women competing in the league. The Fox News-owned sports outlet OutKick later contacted Julie Tétart, a 34-year-old transgender player for Monaco in France's second division, who said playing in the WNBA would be a dream but added that she is older and there are better players.
The WNBA has now signaled that the issue will be discussed quickly. Commissioner Cathy Engelbert sent a memo to teams saying a working group of club presidents and general managers would address transgender-player eligibility at a meeting next week. The league's eligibility rules are covered by the collective bargaining agreement, so any change would involve more than the league office alone.
Inside the WNBA Eligibility Rules and the Push to Define Them
What the Rules Do and Do Not Say
The eligibility framework does not explicitly define woman, nor does it set out criteria based on biological sex, hormone levels or physical characteristics. At the same time, the rules do not contain a provision granting automatic eligibility simply because a player self-identifies as a woman. That gap is exactly what Freedom and White say they are testing: a system that is open enough to be challenged, but not detailed enough to give a clear answer.
This is not purely an internal policy matter. Because eligibility is governed by the collective bargaining agreement between the league and the WNBA Players Association, the final position will likely reflect negotiations with players' representatives, not just a decision from the commissioner's office.
The Provocation and the OutKick Element
Freedom and White are using the draft announcement as a pressure tactic rather than a conventional athletic pursuit. Their claim is that if the standard is genuinely based on inclusion and self-declaration, they should qualify. That framing ignores competitive selection, but it does put the burden on the league to articulate a standard.
The involvement of OutKick also shapes the debate. The outlet encouraged a transgender player to say she would like to play in the WNBA, then used that exchange to criticise the league for not inviting her. The result is less a policy discussion and more a media confrontation that raises the reputational stakes for the WNBA on both sides of a polarised issue.
What Changes After the Upcoming League Meeting
The most concrete development is the memo from Cathy Engelbert. It confirms that the league is treating the current eligibility question as urgent enough to put before team executives. Engelbert said preserving the integrity of the game and ensuring fair competition would remain among the league's highest priorities, language that suggests any clarification will try to balance inclusion with competitive fairness.
What is not yet clear is whether next week's discussion will lead to a new rule, a proposal for the players' union, or a temporary interpretation. The absence of an explicit biological or hormonal standard gives the league room to develop a more detailed policy, but the union's public statement indicates the process will not be simple.
Comments 0