The Sensemaking Argument: From Family Rituals to National Narratives

A Forbes Kazakhstan essay argues that in periods of high uncertainty, what holds a family, a company or a country together is not only shared interests but a culture built on shared meaning. It draws on the concept of sensemaking: when old routines stop working, people ask 'What is happening?'—and leaders who answer that question first can shape the response.

The essay's central mechanism is the 'emotional-semantic construct', a sign or story that packages a rational idea together with a strong positive emotion. It argues that bare meaning rarely persuades. To be adopted, a message should generate hope, confidence, pride or inspiration. The piece gives examples such as family rituals, a Kazakh mutual-aid tradition called 'asar', and a large bank that framed a new sales process around the image of a 'warrior bringing happiness', claiming the change lifted sales by more than 10%.

At state level, the argument is similar: leaders create narratives such as unity, patriotism or 'building the future', transmitted through education and media, to counter fragmentation and the status decline of social groups. The core claim is that the future is constructed through the meanings leaders embed in daily life.

What Holds Up in the Meaning-Making Framework—and What Is Missing

The leadership model: sense first, package second

The essay's clearest contribution is a sequence: a leader interprets an external signal, turns it into a story, then wraps it in an emotionally positive construct so that others can appropriate it. The rationale is that action follows meaning. Without adopted meaning, even well-designed processes produce compliance rather than commitment. In family terms, honesty and responsibility become values only when repeated through rituals. In corporate terms, the bank's sales-process change was tied to a daily ritual and a shared image.

Advertisement

A concrete example, but little verifiable evidence

The bank claim—more than 10% sales growth after adopting the 'warrior bringing happiness' narrative—is offered as an illustrative anecdote, not as a controlled result. The article names no bank, no timeframe and no counterfactual, so the causal link cannot be checked. The framework is plausible, but the evidence base is mainly conceptual rather than empirical.

Where the argument travels best

The logic is most useful for internal integration: onboarding, large process changes, mergers or cultural renewal inside an organisation. It is less directly useful for external shocks such as price competition or regulatory change, because it focuses on how teams interpret events rather than on the events themselves. The state-level application is explicit but thinner; it risks becoming propaganda if emotional packaging is used without genuine shared interest.

Three Leadership Tests From the Bank's 'Warrior' Sales Ritual

For leaders considering this approach, the essay offers three testable principles rather than a ready-made plan.

  • Pair every major change with a named emotional image. The bank example used a 'warrior bringing happiness' identity for a sales-process rollout. Translate that by giving a large internal change its own positive, concrete story—not a bare KPI message.
  • Turn the story into a repeatable ritual. The Kazakh 'asar' tradition works because it is a repeated act of mutual help, not a one-off announcement. If a value or process matters, attach it to a visible, repeated gesture or ceremony.
  • Check for adoption, not just awareness. The framework's stage of 'desire and ability to act' means the test is whether people change their behaviour after the narrative—not whether they can recite the slogan.