Why Marketscreener Is Highlighting Circular Economy Exposure

Marketscreener has published a thematic list focused on the circular economy, a production and consumption model that extends the life of products through sharing, reuse, repair, refurbishment and recycling. The aim is to keep materials in use longer, reduce demand for new raw materials and cut waste.

According to the publication, resource pressure and the growth of single-use waste make reuse and recycling increasingly important. The argument set out is that keeping products in circulation would slow the use of natural resources, limit habitat disruption and help curb biodiversity loss, while also reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

The list frames recycling as a way to mitigate supply risks such as price volatility, availability and import dependence. It highlights one area as especially urgent: with rapid growth in solar panels and electric vehicles, recycling used batteries and panels is becoming a necessity. The list offers exposure to companies that contribute to recycling or other forms of resource efficiency, on the view that those companies should benefit as circular economy demand grows.

Where the Circular Economy Investment Case Gets Specific

The Battery and Solar Panel Recycling Driver

The most concrete claim in the list is that rising deployment of electric vehicles and solar panels creates a growing stream of used equipment that must be handled. That is a real volume driver, but investors should separate the long-term need from current revenue durability. Battery and panel recycling is capital-intensive, and profitability can depend on collection logistics, processing technology and recoverable material prices rather than on the existence of waste volumes alone.

Advertisement

Why Raw Material Constraints Give the Theme Staying Power

The list's core argument is that finite primary raw materials and import dependence make recovery more valuable. This supports the theme when primary commodity prices are high or supply chains are strained. The caveat is that recycling economics are often tied to primary material benchmarks; if lithium, cobalt or polymer prices fall, recovered material becomes less attractive relative to virgin supply, even if environmental benefits remain.

Where Thematic Lists Require Extra Scrutiny

The published description does not name the companies in the list, so the actual exposure cannot be assessed from this material alone. Broad thematic baskets can include businesses with only partial or indirect circular economy revenue. The investment case here is therefore about verification: which companies have meaningful recycling, repair or resource-efficiency operations, and which are included mainly because of a loose sustainability label.

How to Vet a Circular Economy Thematic List

For investors evaluating this thematic list rather than simply accepting the theme, three checks follow from the publication's own argument:

  • Look at constituent revenue mix. The list is described as exposure to recycling and resource efficiency, but no holdings are named. Verify what share of sales at each company comes from reuse, repair, recycling or material recovery.
  • Follow the battery and solar panel value chain. The article identifies used batteries and panels as the urgent need. Check whether the underlying companies are involved in collection, processing or material recovery for those waste streams, not only in peripheral waste management.
  • Test sensitivity to raw material prices. The theme is justified partly by supply risk and price volatility. Ask how a company's recycling margins would perform if lithium, cobalt or polymer prices fell, since recovered material competes with virgin supply.
  • Check the policy backstop. Circular economy demand often depends on regulation such as recycling mandates or extended producer responsibility. Ask whether current policy is already reflected in valuations before assuming additional growth from new rules.