How Szczecin's Fuel Base Permit Suspension Was Overturned

The Samorządowe Kolegium Odwoławcze (SKO), a second-instance administrative body, has overturned the Szczecin mayor's decision to suspend the development-conditions (warunki zabudowy, WZ) procedure for a fuel storage base under construction in the Podjuchy district. The appeals body ruled that the mayor violated the law by halting the proceedings, according to Kacper Stukan, an attorney representing fuel company Octan Energy (listed in filings as Oktan Energy & V/L Service).

The project — seven storage tanks with a combined capacity of 160,000 cubic metres — was started without the necessary permits in late 2025, next to a residential estate. The mayor's April suspension came after protests by residents and a unanimous motion from city councillors. With the suspension now overturned, the company's application for a development-conditions decision, which has been pending for almost nine months, returns to the active track.

The city of Szczecin said on Tuesday that it would again use “available options” to stop the issuance of WZ for the investment, and announced it would pursue a legal route to keep the suspension in place in line with spatial order and the protection of Podjuchy residents' interests. The investor, meanwhile, says it expects the mayor to now issue the conditions decision, and has not ruled out moving the fuel base to an alternative site if the city proposed one that meets the project's requirements.

Separately, the Szczecin prosecutor's office and the Regional Directorate for Environmental Protection are investigating the construction. The site borders a Natura 2000 protected area, and inspectors have found that earthworks carried out on the Oder riverbank may have caused environmental damage.

Advertisement

What the Ruling Does — and Doesn't — Settle for Octan Energy and Podjuchy

Why the SKO Ruling Only Clears One Hurdle

The Samorządowe Kolegium Odwoławcze concluded that the mayor's April decision to suspend the WZ proceedings breached the law, according to the company's lawyer. That puts the development-conditions application back on the table. But the WZ decision is not a construction permit: it determines what can be built on the plot, not whether construction may start. The city has already said it will pursue legal avenues to keep the suspension in place, so the procedural fight is far from over.

Octan Energy's Build-First Approach Carries Risks

The company began earthworks and construction at Podjuchy in late 2025 without the required permits, and has since waited nearly nine months for the WZ decision. Building before a permit creates a fact on the ground, but it also hands opponents a clear legal target. The company now expects the mayor to issue WZ after the SKO ruling, while remaining open — at least on paper — to relocating if the city proposed a suitable site. That conditional offer suggests the company wants a workable outcome, not necessarily this specific location.

The Environmental File Could Decide the Project's Fate

Independent of the planning dispute, the city prosecutor and the Regional Directorate for Environmental Protection are investigating the site. Seven tanks with a combined capacity of 160,000 cubic metres are being built along the Oder riverbank, adjacent to a Natura 2000 protected area. Inspectors have already said the earthworks may have caused environmental damage. If that finding hardens, it could affect the project even after a WZ is issued — and it could shape the city's next legal moves.

What a Relocation Scenario Would Actually Require

The company's lawyer said Octan would certainly consider a move if the city came forward with an alternative location that met the investment's requirements. City authorities have not publicly tabled such a site, and their focus remains on blocking the current one. For Podjuchy residents, the practical question is whether the city's promised legal path can hold the line long enough to force a relocation — or whether the WZ gets issued and the dispute shifts to the environmental track.

Advertisement

What to Watch in the Szczecin Fuel Base Case

For residents, the city council and anyone with a stake in the project, the points below are worth tracking:

  • The WZ decision is not a construction permit. Even if the mayor eventually issues development conditions, the construction began without permits and remains subject to the prosecutor's and environmental authorities' investigations.
  • The city has promised another legal move. Szczecin said it will use legal avenues to try to keep the suspension in place, so the procedural outcome is still open.
  • A relocation offer could change the calculus. Octan Energy says it would consider moving if the city proposed a suitable alternative location that matched the investment's requirements.
  • Environmental findings could constrain the project. Inspectors' preliminary assessment that earthworks on the Oder bank may have caused environmental damage gives authorities a second line of action beyond planning law.