PLA Navy's Qijiguang and Kunlunshan Dock in Muara Port
On July 24, 2026, the Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy's 83rd task force arrived at Muara Port in Brunei, beginning a four-day goodwill visit. The force comprises the training ship Qijiguang (Hull 83) and the amphibious dock landing ship Kunlunshan (Hull 998), both on a far‑seas internship training mission.
The visit was timed to commemorate the 35th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic ties between China and Brunei. During the stay, personnel from both navies conducted mutual ship tours and held friendly sports matches. Chinese servicemembers also visited Bruneian military facilities, the defence academy, and local universities.
On the evening of July 26, the task force hosted an on‑deck reception to mark the 99th anniversary of the PLA’s founding. Additionally, a contingent of sailors performed for local communities and carried out outreach activities. The mission, according to official Chinese readouts, was aimed at strengthening the friendship between the two militaries and their peoples.
What the Visit Signals for China-Brunei Military Ties
Deepening Defense Engagement with Brunei
Although modest in scale, the visit fits a clear pattern of China using port calls by training vessels to build military‑to‑military trust in Southeast Asia. Brunei, a non‑claimant in the South China Sea disputes, has maintained steady diplomatic and defence exchanges with Beijing. The timing—tied to a bilateral milestone—amplifies the political symbolism without introducing new strategic commitments.
Goodwill missions like this serve a dual purpose: they give PLA Navy cadets practical sea experience while projecting an image of a cooperative, approachable military. For Brunei, hosting the visit signals openness to security cooperation that steers clear of alliance politics. The events—sports, ship visits, and community performances—are designed to leave a favourable impression among both military professionals and the public, a soft‑power staple of modern naval diplomacy.
Comments 0