From Supplier to Advisor Side: One Executive's Wake-Up Call
When Andrew Davis became President of MAST Travel Network earlier this year, he thought his two decades on the supplier side — most recently leading national accounts for Holland America Line — had given him a thorough understanding of independent travel advisors. He had sat across the table from them, built relationships, and even spent a short period on the agency side. He quickly learned that familiarity was not the same as insight.
Immersed in a consortium built to support advisors, Davis says the first revelation was how much of an advisor's work is invisible to suppliers. Booking reports capture the sale, but not the hours spent on administration, self-funded marketing, or late-night calls to soothe a client through a cancelled flight or a delayed passport. "We hear the horror stories," he wrote, "but we rarely witness what it actually took to close that sale and back it with real service."
He also saw that what suppliers label as support — portals, check-ins, co-op marketing programs — often lands on advisors as another task to juggle. The intent is well-meaning, but the execution burden falls unevenly. Most importantly, Davis concluded that loyalty in the travel advisory space hinges on trust rather than commission levels or marketing dollars. Advisors stay with a host or consortium that stands with them when problems arise, a factor that spreadsheets cannot capture.
The Hidden Costs and Real Currency of Travel Advisory
Why the Invisible Workload Matters for the Industry
Davis's candid reflection highlights a structural blind spot in travel distribution. Suppliers typically measure advisor value through bookings, but the post-sale service — troubleshooting cancellations, navigating passport delays, and providing emotional reassurance — directly influences client retention and repeat business. When this work goes unrecognized, suppliers risk designing support tools that add friction rather than remove it.
The Trust Economy Behind Advisor Loyalty
The insight that trust is "the actual product" reframes the relationship between advisors, consortia, and suppliers. While competitive commissions and co-op funds are table stakes, Davis argues that what cements loyalty is the feeling of being backed when things go wrong. For consortia and host agencies, this means the operational safety net — fast problem resolution, advocacy, and genuine empathy — often outweighs financial incentives.
A Two-Way Street: Suppliers Also Need Understanding
Davis balanced his message by inviting advisors to see the tradeoffs that suppliers face, suggesting that neither side holds the full picture. This nuance is important: it counters any narrative that suppliers are merely disconnected, pointing instead to a need for mutual education. Industry events and sales calls often focus on selling, but the real opportunity may lie in structured job-shadowing or listening sessions where both parties learn the constraints and pressures of the other.
What Both Sides Can Do Differently
- For suppliers: Build a first-hand understanding of an advisor's daily workload by spending time observing their non-sales tasks before launching new support tools or programs. Davis's experience suggests this can prevent initiatives that add administrative weight rather than lighten it.
- For consortia and host agencies: Audit your support stack by asking not just whether a tool is available, but how much time it demands from an advisor. The most valued support may be the simplest: quick, authoritative help when a booking unravels.
- For travel advisors: Clearly communicate to suppliers and consortia what support actually reduces stress — whether it's a dedicated assistance line, proactive rebooking help, or administrative offloading — rather than accepting every program as equally useful.
Comments 0