Poland's 30 largest defence manufacturers and the SAFE contract surge
The latest ranking of Poland's 30 largest defence manufacturers shows Huta Stalowa Wola at the top with 4.09 billion złoty in 2025 revenue, up 66.8% year on year. The PGZ subsidiary has shifted from 2.4 billion złoty in 2024 to 4.1 billion, driven by serial deliveries of the Borsuk infantry fighting vehicle, the Gladius anti-drone system and the UKWO-N tracked mine-laying carrier, alongside continued Krab howitzer work.
Second and third places go to Leonardo's PZL Świdnik, with just over 3 billion złoty, and private WB Electronics, with 2.86 billion złoty after a slight decline. Mesko, another PGZ ammunition arm, grew by a third to almost 2.28 billion złoty, while Lockheed Martin's Mielec plant recorded 1.88 billion złoty.
The ranking coincides with the start of Poland's largest defence financing programme: under the EU's SAFE instrument, Poland is to receive almost 44 billion euro, or 29% of the 150 billion euro total. Six strategic contracts signed at the end of May are worth almost 60 billion złoty, of which about 42 billion złoty is assigned to HSW alone.
Why SAFE is set to reinforce PGZ's grip—and what it means for private players
HSW and PGZ: a historic order book with delivery risk
Huta Stalowa Wola's contract stack is no longer a single-programme story. It includes a roughly 3 billion złoty order for 50 Krab howitzers for Ukraine, a REGINA programme worth more than 8.9 billion złoty for 96 howitzers in 2027-2029, and SAFE agreements covering further Krabs, 257 Borsuk vehicles and 1,000 Homar-K launcher vehicles. The 42 billion złoty initial SAFE share dwarfs historical state defence contracting capacity. That scale explains why PGZ expects up to 100 billion złoty to flow to its subsidiaries, but it also makes execution, workforce and supply-chain bottlenecks the real test.
WB Electronics: private leader faces a scaling pause, not a demand problem
WB Electronics grew from 343 million złoty in 2021 to almost 3 billion in 2024, but 2025 revenue slipped to 2.85 billion złoty and missed earlier expectations of 4.3 billion. The company did not fully explain the shortfall. The article points to revenue recognition tied to phased deliveries and acceptances under Warmate, FlyEye, Gladius and Topaz contracts for K9 howitzers, as well as the delayed ramp-up of a new Warmate factory. With a stated order backlog of 6-8 billion złoty and over 85% of sales concentrated in the Ministry of Defence and Armament Agency, the company's 2026 result will hinge on converting that backlog rather than winning new demand.
Mesko and the Piorun export boom
Mesko's 33% growth reflects ammunition demand and the export success of the Piorun man-portable air-defence system, sold to the Baltic states, Norway, Sweden, Belgium and the United States. Production of about 1,300 Piorun sets a year has allowed the company to raise prices and margins, while ammunition output has reached one million small- and medium-calibre rounds per day. Talks with Northrop Grumman on co-producing 120mm ammunition could eventually lift capacity to 50,000-70,000 rounds annually.
Leonardo's Świdnik plant outruns Lockheed's Mielec
Among foreign-owned manufacturers, PZL Świdnik is now clearly ahead. Its revenue exceeds 3 billion złoty as the AW149 helicopter programme moves into production and delivery of 32 aircraft, including integration, armament, logistics, training and servicing. Lockheed Martin's Mielec plant finished its domestic Black Hawk order and remains a component exporter, a model that generates lower and less volatile revenue than prime programme delivery.
Why SAFE is likely to freeze the existing hierarchy
The programme is formally ownership-neutral, and officials say orders should split roughly half between state and private industry. In practice, the entry threshold is extremely high: contracts are measured in billions of złoty with delivery schedules reaching 2030, requiring capacity, working capital and engineering depth that few private firms possess. Annual SAFE spending may average 45 billion złoty, whereas the previous state-sector record was about 12 billion złoty in a single year. That favours PGZ and the handful of private champions such as WB Electronics, while smaller private listed firms—Creotech Instruments, Cognor and Lubawa are named but without disclosed contract values—are likely to remain in subcontractor roles.
Key milestones for defence suppliers, investors and policymakers
For companies and investors exposed to Poland's defence programme, the ranking points to specific milestones rather than broad themes.
- Track HSW's delivery cadence against its 42 billion złoty SAFE share. The company must move from 4.1 billion złoty revenue to programmes worth tens of billions, with REGINA deliveries starting in 2027—execution, not order intake, is the core risk.
- Watch WB Electronics' 2026 revenue recognition. A 6-8 billion złoty backlog and a new Warmate factory should support a rebound, but the 2025 miss shows that phased accepts can shift results between years.
- Follow Mesko's Piorun and 120mm ammunition capacity. Current output of roughly 1,300 Piorun sets and one million rounds per day is the base; the Northrop Grumman talks would signal a step-change in medium-calibre production.
- For private suppliers, prime SAFE contracts remain a narrow path. With an annual spending target of about 45 billion złoty against a 12 billion record, subcontracting to PGZ or WB Electronics is likely the more realistic entry point than bidding for billion-złoty primes.
- Watch whether the declared 50/50 state-private split survives implementation. PGZ's own estimate of up to 100 billion złoty suggests state companies may capture more than half; the composition of awarded contracts will be the key policy signal.
Risk & Opportunity Assessment
| Commercial Risk | High | Poland's SAFE pipeline implies annual defence spending around 45bn PLN, far above the previous state-sector record of 12bn PLN; HSW alone has 42bn PLN in initial contracts, making execution and delivery bottlenecks the main commercial risk. |
| Competitive Risk | Medium | SAFE's billion-złoty contracts and long delivery schedules favour incumbent PGZ companies and WB Electronics, while smaller private firms such as Creotech, Cognor and Lubawa are named without disclosed prime contract values. |
| Regulatory Risk | Medium | The programme is formally ownership-neutral and politicians promise a 50/50 state-private split, but historical annual contracting and priority for state companies may complicate equal access if implementation details shift. |
| Reputation Risk | Medium | A widening gap between the declared neutral split and PGZ's estimate of up to 100bn PLN could create political scrutiny over whether SAFE is entrenching state-owned dominance. |
| Technology Disruption | Medium | Ukrainian battlefield needs are driving demand for anti-drone systems, MANPADS and ammunition; companies with those products—HSW, WB Electronics, Mesko—benefit, but production scaling is the decisive constraint. |
| Commercial Opportunity | Transformational | Poland's 44bn euro, 29% share of the 150bn euro SAFE programme—the largest national allocation—is the biggest financing shock in the sector's modern history, with almost 60bn złoty signed in late May alone. |
Comments 0