Why Brasília Expects Retaliation to Miss the October Vote

Brazilian government officials expect the reciprocity process against the United States to extend beyond the country's October 25 presidential runoff, pushing any effective retaliation past election day unless Washington escalates first. The process formally opened on Thursday with Brazil's notification to Washington and is projected to last 60 to 90 days, a period that covers diplomatic consultations and talks with Brazilian sectors hit by the US tariffs of 25% and 12.5% imposed in July.

That timetable is not fixed. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's aides say the scenario could change quickly if the Trump administration announces another measure against Brazil. In that case, Brasília could impose taxes on American products before the conclusion of the formal process.

Even so, the path the government currently sees as most likely is not new import taxes on US goods. Officials prefer other instruments in the Reciprocity Law approved by Congress, such as suspending intellectual-property obligations on American products and blocking royalty remittances. That approach, they argue, would avoid harming the Brazilian economy; retaliatory tariffs on American products would be used only where other countries produce comparable alternatives.

The government views the Reciprocity Law as a deterrent against further US measures and expects Washington to return to tariff negotiations only after Brazil's vote. Behind that calculation is a political read: the Trump administration is seen as anticipating easier negotiations if Flávio Bolsonaro wins, including possible preferences in rare-earth exploration. If Lula wins, Planalto officials believe Trump will have to negotiate because he would face Lula in power at least until late 2028.

Advertisement

The Political Calculus Behind Brazil's Reciprocity Threat

Why Brasília Is Downplaying Import Tariffs

The government's preferred use of the Reciprocity Law is a calculated attempt to raise pressure without raising costs at home. By suspending intellectual-property obligations and blocking US royalty payments, Brazil could target American interests while limiting damage to Brazilian firms that rely on imported goods. Officials say the more conventional tariff route would be reserved for products with non-US substitutes, which suggests Brasília wants to avoid supply shocks in sectors with no easy alternative.

The Election as the Real Deadline

The 60-to-90-day process matters mainly because it takes the dispute beyond the October 25 second round. Planalto officials read the US posture through the election: a Bolsonaro victory, in their view, would make it easier for Washington to press demands such as preferential access to rare-earth exploration; a Lula victory would force the Trump administration to negotiate with the same interlocutors it has pressured.

The Escalation Clause

The main uncertainty is not the formal calendar but Washington's next move. If the United States announces new punitive measures, Brazil has signaled it could apply reciprocity before the process concludes. That makes the dispute a tit-for-tat risk: each new US action could shorten the timeline and alter the preferred soft-tariff path.

What Brazilian Firms and Importers Should Watch

Because the official timeline is 60 to 90 days and the second round is October 25, affected businesses should plan for a post-election decision rather than immediate retaliation:

  • Brazilian companies that remit royalties to US rights holders should assess exposure to a suspension of intellectual-property obligations, which officials identify as the most likely initial instrument.
  • Importers of US goods should map whether non-US substitutes exist, since Brasília says tariffs would be applied only where comparable alternatives are available.
  • Exporters to the US should not expect a negotiated rollback of the July tariffs of 25% and 12.5% before the October vote; the government expects talks to resume only after the election.
  • Any new US trade measure against Brazil should be treated as a trigger that could bring immediate reciprocal action, even before the 60-to-90-day process ends.

Risk & Opportunity Assessment

Commercial RiskMediumIf Brazil activates the reciprocity law, companies linked to US goods or royalty flows could face new costs, but the stated preference for IP/royalty measures rather than broad tariffs limits the immediate commercial damage.
Competitive RiskMediumTariffs on American products would be imposed only where non-US substitutes exist, potentially shifting Brazilian demand to suppliers from other countries while excluding US firms from some sales.
Regulatory RiskHighThe reciprocity process is now formally open with a 60-to-90-day timeline; it could accelerate if Washington announces new measures, and it opens the door to suspension of IP obligations and royalty blockages.
Reputation RiskMediumUsing intellectual-property suspensions may strain US-Brazil relations and raise concerns about Brazil's IP enforcement, even though officials say they want to avoid harming Brazilian companies.
Technology DisruptionMediumIf Brazil suspends intellectual-property obligations on American products, technology and industrial sectors reliant on US patents, software or know-how could face legal and operational uncertainty.
Commercial OpportunityMediumNon-US producers of goods that compete with American products could gain Brazilian market share if selective tariffs are applied.